Empire Hotel, New York City, Big Deal

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Empire Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

76th

Out of 676

Empire Hotel	Average Price: $401 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

44 West 63rd Street

New York City, 10023 View map

0-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 249
Average review rating: 3.49

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (11) , Travelocity (3) , Expedia (96) , TripAdvisor (1016)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (21) annoy (43) avoid (23) awful (33) bad (111) big deal (11) broken (31) complain (68) complaint (37) cramped (22) difficult (23) dirty (26) disappoint (90) disturbing (32) downside (13) expensive (101) frustrated (12) hard (46) hardly (12) hassle (15) horrible (26) inconvenient (14) issue (86) lack (29) loud (113) mistake (13) mold (18) negative (55) noise (197) noisy (98) overpriced (23) poor (52) poorly (15) pricey (21) problem (165) ridiculous (23) rude (76) shame (16) shock (11) slow (20) smell (37) terrible (39) tiny (164) too small (17) unbearable (12) uncomfortable (23) unfortunate (39) unhelpful (11) worst (41) wrong (31)

Big deal

Appears in 11 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Big deal:
bathroom (3) big (11) deal (11) mess (2) not (7) room (2) shower (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. No big deal, I didn't really NEED a bathrobe, but I wanted to wear one as we watched tv, and for 500.

"NOT a four star hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

2. The staff were not exactly warm and fuzzy but I was only there for a night so it was no big deal.

"No way is this a 4 star hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/20/2012 Vote

3. There were some issues at check in but not sure if the girl was new and so wouldnt really make a big deal of it - we all had bad first days.

"Gorgeous hotel but expensive! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/30/2011 Vote

4. The hand spray on the shower did not work, but that wasn't a big deal.

"Trendy Hotel, Great Staff, Noisy Room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

5. She made a big deal that she had to get security and I would have to identify everything in the room to them before we could get upstairs.

"Clean but a lot to be desired " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/19/2011 Vote

6. Just two little things: the bathroom was a tad small (not a big deal, it is NYC after all) and had that single paned glass shower door which can make for a mess in the bathroom, 2) the internet connection in the business center was so slow that I could not access my email at all.

"Terrific. I'll be back. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/16/2011 Vote

7. Not big deal right? Well, turn on the water & there's a good chance you'll create a little mess.

"Empire Strikes Back -- Shower Heads w/deadly aim " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2011 Vote

8. No big deal, though.

"awesome hotel... fantastic room, very comfortable beds, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/17/2011 Vote

9. The room faced the air shaft, which had a fan noise all of the time, but that was no big deal.

"Location, location, location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2010 Vote

10. The bathroom had a shower only-no tub which is not a big deal for us but might be for others.

"Hope you like cabbage " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/28/2009 Vote