Quality Inn Spokane, Spokane, Room

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Washington » Spokane Destinations » Spokane Hotels » Quality Inn Spokane

OpinionWell
Rank

12th

Out of 94

Quality Inn Spokane	Average Price: $126 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

7919 North Division Street

Spokane, 99208 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 32
Average review rating: 3.94

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: MyTravelGuide (1) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (56) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (1) bar (3) bath (1) bathroom (2) bed (13) bill (1) breakfast (46) cable (1) charge (1) check in (8) check out (1) complimentary (6) cost (2) deal (2) downtown (5) fitness room (2) food (5) front desk (14) gym (1) hot tub (8) hotel (65) housekeeping (2) lobby (7) location (21) maid (2) manager (1) neighborhood (1) parking (6) pillow (2) pool (28) price (10) rate (8) recommend (7) restaurant (10) room (87) service (11) shower (9) spa (1) staff (30) street (1) suite (3) towel (3) tub (2) value (5) view (1) walk (1) walk-in (1) water pressure (1) whirlpool (3) wireless (4)

Room	Appears in 85 comments. 76% wrote positive comments about room

The following words were used in comments with Room:
clean (19) comfortable (8) desk (10) friendly (6) good (7) great (5) hotel (13) location (5) nice (7) quiet (6) size (10) small (5) smoke (4) spacious (6) staff (8) well (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Quiet, comfortable sleep, nice rooms, great pool (24 hours) and top it all off with a good continental breakfast that is open from 6:00 am to 10:00 am.

"Excellent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote

2. The room was clean and nice.

"Nice Pool! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/21/2012 Vote

3. Staff at the front desk and the breakfast rooms always initiated a friendly greeting when we approached.

"Excellent mid-range hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/16/2012 Vote

4. The room was clean, with comfortable beds and a flat-screen tv.

"Excellent mid-range hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/16/2012 Vote

5. The rooms are clean and quiet.

"Nice Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/16/2012 Vote

6. I flew there from New York and was very happy to get such a great room to relax in after a very long flight.

"Overall great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2012 Vote

7. The room was flawless had a whirlpool room, belcony, fireplace, two flatscreen televisions, the most comfortable bed that i have ever slept on, and my favorite was that it had two shower heads in the shower on opposite sides, very impressive.

"Overall great hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2012 Vote

8. The Regular rooms are nice as well.

"Great Place, Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/1/2011 Vote

9. This is our second year to spend two nights at the Oakwood for Black Friday; room is clean and all staff very accommodating and friendly; some buttons were sticky on the phone in our room and couldn't dial out; in less than five minutes after calling the desk we had a brand new set installed.

"Clean and quiet " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/29/2011 Vote

10. This is a so so looking from the outside hotel, but inside it is great, the staff are very friendly and the rooms are roomy, very clean and the breakfast is great.

"Great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2011 Vote