Hotel Diva, San Francisco, Clean

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Diva

OpinionWell
Rank

56th

Out of 493

Hotel Diva	Average Price: $203 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

440 Geary Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 21 of 110
Average review rating: 3.93

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (126) , Travelocity (23) , TripAdvisor (461) , YahooTravel (19)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (17) affordable (13) attentive (6) awesome (9) beautiful (10) best (35) better (27) big (31) cares (18) clean (134) comfortable (132) comfy (18) convenient (32) cool (24) courteous (10) decent (9) efficient (10) enjoyable (9) excellent (30) exceptional (9) fabulous (7) fantastic (26) fast (7) free (61) fresh (12) friendly (146) fun (26) funky (16) generous (7) good (160) great (269) happy (21) helpful (110) huge (11) impressed (17) liked (87) love (32) new (31) nice (122) perfect (30) pleasant (23) plenty (17) positive (6) pressure (7) quiet (24) reasonable (18) spacious (17) stylish (10) welcoming (17) wonderful (26)

Clean

Appears in 246 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Clean:
bathroom (31) bed (43) comfortable (49) decorate (14) friendly (26) good (13) great (20) helpful (10) hotel (65) location (26) modern (21) nice (35) not (27) room (162) size (10) small (21) spacious (9) staff (35) towel (9) well (13)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Small hotel, but the rooms were decent size and clean.

"Great location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

2. Wouldn't suggest Diva for a romantic couples weekend or to have a room where you can entertain, but if you're looking for a nice, clean room to sleep in with a relatively pleasant staff, you can't go wrong (unless their rooms are over $200--that wouldn't be worth it to me).

"Just Fine " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

3. Hotel rooms where clean, small but quaint.

"Great Location, friendly staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

4. Lobby was clean, modern, and chic.

"Great Location, friendly staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/13/2012 Vote

5. Our room was more spacious than we expected, very clean and nicely decorated.

"Quaint hotel, excellent location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2012 Vote

6. Bathroom was mostly clean, but we didn't feel that the quality of towels, bedding and bed matched up with our expectations for a hotel of this price.

"Good location, with some draw backs " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/15/2012 Vote

7. Very clean hotel.

"lovely Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2012 Vote

8. This hotel is well decorated and clean the style is lovely we had a nice room and the position of this hotel is excellant for getting everywhere.

"lovely Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2012 Vote

9. ; our basic room was larger than I would have expected; there is Starbucks connected to the lobby; the bed was very comfortable, with soft clean sheets; and the design/styling was a real smile-inducer.

"The Diva's always right " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

10. Pro: central, nice, clean, bathtub, gym, comfy beds.

"Funky hotel in central location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2012 Vote