The Blakely New York, New York City, Value

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » The Blakely New York

OpinionWell
Rank

96th

Out of 676

The Blakely New York	Average Price: $425 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

136 West 55th Street

New York City, 10019 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 31 of 154
Average review rating: 4.44

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (2) , MyTravelGuide (11) , Travelocity (7) , TripAdvisor (380) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (11) bar (17) bath (24) bathroom (106) bed (83) breakfast (222) charge (13) check in (23) check out (12) closet (15) complimentary (27) concierge (42) cost (19) deal (10) decor (19) dinner (18) discount (7) fitness center (5) food (38) front desk (36) gym (7) hotel (549) housekeeping (19) lobby (67) location (233) lunch (6) manager (13) mini bar (7) money (13) parking (5) pillow (13) price (45) rate (37) recommend (50) restaurant (106) room (538) room service (7) service (85) sheets (6) shower (52) staff (262) street (91) suite (133) towel (17) tub (14) value (21) view (16) walk (66) water pressure (5) wireless (19)

Value

Appears in 21 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about value

The following words were used in comments with Value:
comfortable (4) efficient (2) excellent (4) free (3) friendly (4) good (5) great (4) hotel (7) internet (2) location (4) money (4) new (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Overall- excellent value for money.

"Boutique hotel in great location offering very good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

2. Overall and given the prices of hotels in the city it's a good value.

"Our Stay at The Blakely " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

3. The Blakely is not a super-deluxe hotel and doesn't pretend to be but it is an terrific value.

"Perfect mini-apartment for extended stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/13/2011 Vote

4. Good value for the neighborhood.

"nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/11/2011 Vote

5. Excellent value for the location and amenities.

"A great Stay in Midtown " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/14/2011 Vote

6. It is not cheap but for the area offers a great value.

"A Wonderful Hotel for the Experienced Traveler and Everyone Else " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/30/2011 Vote

7. The Blakely was a great value.

"Great choice in mid-town Manhattan " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/13/2011 Vote

8. This is not a luxury property, but it is well kept, well above average and with free wi-fi and breakfast, large suite it is a great value for Manhattan.

"Great choice in mid-town Manhattan " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/13/2011 Vote

9. Our stay in the Blakely, from 7th - 11th October was a pleasant one, friendly and efficient staff at reception, a kitchenette in the comfortable room, free internet, and buffet breakfast- good value for money for New York.

"Good hotel but disapointing service in the restaurant " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2010 Vote

10. Our stay in the Blakely, from 7th - 11th October was a pleasant one, friendly and efficient staff at reception, a kitchenette in the comfortable room, free internet, and buffet breakfast- good value for money for New York.

"Good hotel but disapointing service in the restaurant " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/4/2010 Vote