Paramount Hotel New York, New York City, Concierge

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Paramount Hotel New York

OpinionWell
Rank

98th

Out of 676

Paramount Hotel New York	Average Price: $318 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

235 W 46TH St

New York City, 10036 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 154
Average review rating: 2.88

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (69) , MyTravelGuide (99) , TripAdvisor (1703) , YahooTravel (88)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (42) bar (293) bath (61) bathroom (436) bathtub (25) bed (600) bill (32) breakfast (210) charge (94) check in (186) check out (49) closet (80) complimentary (34) concierge (141) cost (78) deal (70) decor (98) dinner (39) fee (20) food (87) front desk (189) gym (24) hotel (2760) housekeeping (44) lobby (469) location (1009) manager (52) money (124) parking (31) pillow (53) price (309) rate (103) recommend (241) refund (20) restaurant (237) room (3440) room service (47) service (304) sheets (36) shower (211) staff (787) street (175) suite (54) towel (103) tub (37) value (81) view (130) walk (230) water pressure (23) wireless (98)

Concierge

Appears in 141 comments.

86% wrote positive comments about concierge

The following words were used in comments with Concierge:
best (7) desk (29) friendly (18) good (8) great (15) helpful (65) hotel (23) lobby (8) location (7) need (9) nice (9) recommend (8) reservation (7)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The Concierge was extremely helpful, managed to get us clear directions to Coney Island without getting lost and arranged for hard to get dinner reservations.

"Perfect location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2012 Vote

2. The service in the concierge was average, a woman who assisted us suddenly helped another couple while we were asking her questions.

"Tiny room but great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2012 Vote

3. Another shout-out to the lovely people at the concierge desk.

"A treasure in New York City " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

4. *while the staff at concierge were friendly, we found them to be unhelpful.

"Comfortable and good-value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

5. The front desk staff was very welcoming (Nathalie and Rachel) and the concierge helpful in mapping out our days in NY.

"Modern and Chic Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2012 Vote

6. I wasn't sure where my boyfriend and I should go to dinner so I asked the concierge and he recommended this great place called Bobby Vans on 50th street.

"Best NYC hotel i've stayed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

7. The staff we encountered were pleasant especially the concierge who helped us find our bearings on the first day with the free maps and advice.

"Fab location! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/26/2012 Vote

8. Hotel lobby was very nicely decorated and concierge staff were always helpful.

"Good enough rooms to sleep in " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/25/2012 Vote

9. The staff at the front was helpful, though the concierge less so.

"Great value in the city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/23/2012 Vote

10. The concierge are always very helpful with booking excursions or show tickets.

"Love this hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote