Marriott Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Accommodating

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Los Angeles Destinations » Los Angeles Hotels » Marriott Los Angeles

OpinionWell
Rank

67th

Out of 700

Marriott Los Angeles	Average Price: $304 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

333 South Figueroa Street

Los Angeles, 90071 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 23 of 45
Average review rating: 3.61

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (7) , Expedia (31) , MyTravelGuide (627) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (215) , YahooTravel (16)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (6) adequate (5) affordable (4) amazing (7) awesome (5) beautiful (12) best (13) better (22) big (27) cares (13) cheaper (13) clean (88) cleanliness (6) comfortable (63) comfy (10) convenient (20) courteous (9) decent (19) efficient (11) excellent (22) exceptional (12) fantastic (9) fast (4) free (28) fresh (7) friendly (59) fun (6) generous (5) good (131) great (102) happy (10) helpful (40) huge (17) liked (48) love (11) new (16) nice (131) perfect (10) pleasant (6) plenty (8) positive (5) professional (18) quiet (18) reasonable (10) reasonably (5) responsive (5) soft (5) spacious (23) welcoming (8) wonderful (7)

Accommodating

Appears in 53 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Accommodating:
area (3) bed (5) comfortable (5) desk (3) excellent (6) experience (5) friendly (11) good (4) great (9) happy (3) hotel (5) location (2) luxurious (2) need (3) nice (3) not (6) room (11) small (2) staff (22) suggestion (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The hotel itself is actually very nice, large comfortable rooms, wonderful restaurant, accommodating, friendly staff.

"Great Rooms and Food, strange surroundings " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/14/2012 Vote

2. They were able to accommodate my milk intolerance by bringing me soy milk which I was impressed with.

"A good centrally located hotel for Los Angeles " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/14/2011 Vote

3. My Do Not Disturb sign was honored, and when I asked the front desk for the room to be made up later in the afternoon after sleeping in on New Years' Day, I was accommodated without a problem.

"No complaints here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/31/2010 Vote

4. Employees couldn't have been more accommodating.

"Great Stay " Read full review on Travelocity 1/1/2010 Vote

5. Found all staff eager to extend themselves to assist us, including the waiter working the bar/restaurant in the lobby area, to accommodate me for a lunch in the mid afternoon.

"A very pleasant and pleasurable find. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/26/2009 Vote

6. They accommodated our needs.

"Impressed with the service.. definitely will go back. " Read full review on Expedia 7/29/2009 Vote

7. I was very happy with the accommodations and overall experience.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 3/26/2009 Vote

8. My experience may be an isolated incident, but I am really not happy with my accommodation there.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 3/23/2009 Vote

9. Didn't have extensive interaction with the staff, but overall very polite and accommodating staff.

"Beautiful Public Spaces " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/14/2009 Vote

10. My experience may be an isolated incident, but I am really not happy with my accommodation there.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 1/8/2009 Vote